Triple
T24937498
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jennifer Granholm |
E623355
|
entity |
| Predicate | succeededBy (Attorney General of Michigan) |
P38396
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mike Cox |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mike Cox | Statement: [Jennifer Granholm, succeededBy (Attorney General of Michigan), Mike Cox]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: succeededBy (Attorney General of Michigan) Context triple: [Jennifer Granholm, succeededBy (Attorney General of Michigan), Mike Cox]
-
A.
succeededBy (as Attorney General)
chosen
Indicates that one individual later held the position of Attorney General after another individual, directly following them in that office.
-
B.
succeededBy (Governor of Michigan)
Indicates that one individual directly follows another in holding the office of Governor of Michigan.
-
C.
succeededBy (Solicitor General of the United States)
Indicates that one individual later held the position of Solicitor General of the United States after another, directly following them in that office.
-
D.
precededBy (as Attorney General)
Indicates that one person previously held the position of Attorney General before another person.
-
E.
succeededBy (Sixth Circuit)
Indicates that one entity in the context of the Sixth Circuit comes after and replaces another in a sequence, such as in office, position, or role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac6b5a48190a1c38857f00915a9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5ffc74fa481909b4fe24a9337f9eb |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f7f99dc08190afcfb3bc4dfbec1d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:30 a.m.