Triple
T2493260
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | One man, one vote |
E52094
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalInfluenceOn |
P13177
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on apportionment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on apportionment | Statement: [One man, one vote, hasLegalInfluenceOn, U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on apportionment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalInfluenceOn Context triple: [One man, one vote, hasLegalInfluenceOn, U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on apportionment]
-
A.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
B.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
C.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
chosen
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
D.
hasLegalEffect
Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
-
E.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4955111c8190835bf619adec21ff |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd192cad08190b13bf8e2d7149199 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0b980b481908d4932bcea4a6167 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:45 p.m.