Triple
T24918810
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vietnamese law |
E624062
|
entity |
| Predicate | prosecutionAuthority |
P5672
|
FINISHED |
| Object | People’s Procuracies of Vietnam |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: People’s Procuracies of Vietnam | Statement: [Vietnamese law, prosecutionAuthority, People’s Procuracies of Vietnam]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: prosecutionAuthority Context triple: [Vietnamese law, prosecutionAuthority, People’s Procuracies of Vietnam]
-
A.
prosecutingAuthority
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for bringing and conducting legal proceedings against another party in a criminal or regulatory case.
-
B.
jurisdictionOfProsecution
Indicates the legal authority or territory within which a prosecution is carried out or has the power to proceed.
-
C.
subjectOfProsecution
Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
-
D.
prosecutorialStatement
Indicates that a statement is made by a prosecutor in the context of a legal or criminal proceeding.
-
E.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac889c081908e9ff686cb428e5a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f4238e43c08190be03e813b8cdfe28 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4210130d08190ae30b7943f7a0bbc |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:28 a.m.