Triple
T24906690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1993 Canadian federal election |
E623727
|
entity |
| Predicate | thirdPlaceLeader |
P35718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Preston Manning |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Preston Manning | Statement: [1993 Canadian federal election, thirdPlaceLeader, Preston Manning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thirdPlaceLeader Context triple: [1993 Canadian federal election, thirdPlaceLeader, Preston Manning]
-
A.
thirdPlaceRank
Indicates that an entity holds the third position in a ranking or ordered list relative to others.
-
B.
thirdPlaceCandidate
chosen
Indicates that the subject is the candidate who finished in third place in a competition, ranking, or election.
-
C.
thirdPlaceCandidateAlliance
Indicates an alliance or cooperative relationship formed by the candidate who finished in third place, typically with another candidate or group.
-
D.
thirdPlaceTeam
Indicates that a team finished in third place in a competition, league, or ranking.
-
E.
thirdPlaceParty
Indicates that an entity finished in third place in a competitive event or ranking.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac797cc8190b30d77f4121099ac |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f464b4c9b0819085daa00c7c3b8b76 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f45cf017a88190b4985b11159c907d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:27 a.m.