Triple

T24882543
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1814 E622750 entity
Predicate confirmedBritishRuleOver P6044 FINISHED
Object Cape Colony NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cape Colony | Statement: [Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1814, confirmedBritishRuleOver, Cape Colony]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confirmedBritishRuleOver
Context triple: [Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1814, confirmedBritishRuleOver, Cape Colony]
  • A. capitalDuringBritishRule
    Indicates that a place served as the capital of a region or polity specifically during the period of British rule.
  • B. viewOnBritishRule
    Indicates a person or group's attitude, opinion, or stance toward British colonial rule.
  • C. maintainedColonialRuleOver
    Indicates that one entity continued to exercise colonial control, governance, or dominance over another entity for a period of time.
  • D. broughtUnderBritishCrown chosen
    Indicates that an entity was placed under the authority, control, or sovereignty of the British Crown.
  • E. administrativeStatusUnderBritish
    Indicates the type or condition of an entity’s administrative relationship or governance status under British authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fac4aa848190b3446a3922cec150 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f43043512481909501a3979cac9947 completed May 1, 2026, 4:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f420fd375c81908ea4a4e60b76ee8f completed May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:24 a.m.