Triple

T24879794
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject No More Doggin' E622668 entity
Predicate isInfluentialExampleOf P69465 FINISHED
Object shuffle style LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shuffle style | Statement: [No More Doggin', isInfluentialExampleOf, shuffle style]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInfluentialExampleOf
Context triple: [No More Doggin', isInfluentialExampleOf, shuffle style]
  • A. isCanonicalExampleOf
    Indicates that something serves as a standard or typical instance that exemplifies a concept, category, or pattern.
  • B. usedAsExampleIn
    Indicates that one entity is cited or presented as an illustrative example within another entity, such as a text, discussion, or explanation.
  • C. notableExampleAt
    Indicates that something serves as a prominent or illustrative example of something else in a particular context or location.
  • D. notableExampleBy
    Indicates that something serves as a prominent or illustrative example provided or created by a particular entity.
  • E. influentialFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity has exerted influence on another, contributing to or shaping the latter’s ideas, behavior, or development.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fac4aa848190b3446a3922cec150 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442b8479c8190a7c8e416ac9e28a0 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:24 a.m.