Triple

T24853596
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lúzhōu E621957 entity
Predicate romanizesToponym P157446 FINISHED
Object Luzhou, Sichuan, China NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Luzhou, Sichuan, China | Statement: [Lúzhōu, romanizesToponym, Luzhou, Sichuan, China]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanizesToponym
Context triple: [Lúzhōu, romanizesToponym, Luzhou, Sichuan, China]
  • A. romanizationOfToponymType
    Indicates a relationship where a specific type of place-name is expressed in a romanized (Latin-script) form corresponding to its original writing system.
  • B. romanizationFrom
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation derived from the script or writing system of another entity.
  • C. romanizationProcess
    Indicates the process of converting text from a non-Latin writing system into a representation using the Latin alphabet.
  • D. exampleRomanization chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation (in Latin script) of the other entity’s original text or name.
  • E. romanizationVariantOf
    Indicates that one written form is a different romanized representation of the same underlying word or expression as another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fac297e481909d3aedc75f585e42 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f453035f508190be83a3d521723acf completed May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f44d6ef33081908f5d36ba1ae5f473 completed May 1, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:21 a.m.