Triple
T24847996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | the king (The Little Prince) |
E621808
|
entity |
| Predicate | rationalizes |
P58734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | his lack of subjects |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: his lack of subjects | Statement: [the king (The Little Prince), rationalizes, his lack of subjects]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rationalizes Context triple: [the king (The Little Prince), rationalizes, his lack of subjects]
-
A.
rationalized
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or belief has been justified or explained in a way that makes it appear logical or reasonable, whether or not that justification is fully valid.
-
B.
rationalizationOf
Indicates that one entity serves as a justification, explanation, or reasoning framework for another entity, often making the latter appear more logical or acceptable.
-
C.
justification
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
D.
canReasonAbout
Indicates that one entity has the capability to understand, analyze, or draw inferences about another entity or subject.
-
E.
justified
Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac297e481909d3aedc75f585e42 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f43043512481909501a3979cac9947 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 4:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f420fd375c81908ea4a4e60b76ee8f |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:20 a.m.