Triple
T24847987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | the king (The Little Prince) |
E621808
|
entity |
| Predicate | insistsThat |
P22457
|
FINISHED |
| Object | his orders are always reasonable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: his orders are always reasonable | Statement: [the king (The Little Prince), insistsThat, his orders are always reasonable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: insistsThat Context triple: [the king (The Little Prince), insistsThat, his orders are always reasonable]
-
A.
insistsOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity firmly demands, persists in, or strongly maintains that another entity perform, accept, or adhere to something.
-
B.
ensures
Indicates that one entity guarantees or makes certain that a particular condition, outcome, or state holds for another entity or situation.
-
C.
maintainsThat
Indicates that one entity asserts, claims, or upholds a particular proposition, belief, or statement about something.
-
D.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
E.
affirms
Indicates that one entity explicitly confirms, supports, or asserts the truth or validity of another entity, statement, or proposition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac297e481909d3aedc75f585e42 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442b8479c8190a7c8e416ac9e28a0 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:20 a.m.