Triple
T24841008
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inga II Dam |
E621611
|
entity |
| Predicate | electricityExportPotential |
P160820
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southern Africa |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern Africa | Statement: [Inga II Dam, electricityExportPotential, Southern Africa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electricityExportPotential Context triple: [Inga II Dam, electricityExportPotential, Southern Africa]
-
A.
energyExporter
Indicates that an entity supplies or sells energy resources or power to other entities, typically across regional or national boundaries.
-
B.
hasRenewableEnergyPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses conditions or characteristics that make it suitable for generating energy from renewable sources.
-
C.
providesElectricityShare
Indicates that one entity supplies a specified portion or share of electricity to another entity.
-
D.
electricityMarketedBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for marketing, promoting, or selling electricity provided by another entity.
-
E.
exportsElectricityTo
Indicates that one entity supplies or sends electrical power to another entity as an export.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac185d48190a0a6073ad1f6b792 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60ac643108190ae81561267155791 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f606c15af88190958856a9e467b826 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:18 a.m.