Triple
T24834943
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Citizens’ Committee |
E621442
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOutcomeAssociatedWith |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court decision upholding segregation in Plessy v. Ferguson |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court decision upholding segregation in Plessy v. Ferguson | Statement: [Citizens’ Committee, legalOutcomeAssociatedWith, Supreme Court decision upholding segregation in Plessy v. Ferguson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOutcomeAssociatedWith Context triple: [Citizens’ Committee, legalOutcomeAssociatedWith, Supreme Court decision upholding segregation in Plessy v. Ferguson]
-
A.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
B.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
C.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
D.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
E.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac185d48190a0a6073ad1f6b792 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f497bc12b881908fe3386c66252bf6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f49366e8d08190adb4b71fe3a14683 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:17 a.m.