Triple
T24834919
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Citizens’ Committee |
E621442
|
entity |
| Predicate | organizedLegalChallenge |
P159040
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plessy v. Ferguson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plessy v. Ferguson | Statement: [Citizens’ Committee, organizedLegalChallenge, Plessy v. Ferguson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: organizedLegalChallenge Context triple: [Citizens’ Committee, organizedLegalChallenge, Plessy v. Ferguson]
-
A.
organizesLawFrom
Indicates that one entity arranges, structures, or systematizes legal rules, principles, or information originating from another entity or source.
-
B.
mainLegalIssue
Indicates the primary legal question or dispute that is central to a case or legal matter.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac185d48190a0a6073ad1f6b792 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f497bc12b881908fe3386c66252bf6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f49366e8d08190adb4b71fe3a14683 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f497b8abb88190bb672cf6907c4b8d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:17 a.m.