Triple

T24822288
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CGS-EMU system E621092 entity
Predicate usesCoherentUnit P158734 FINISHED
Object abampere LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: abampere | Statement: [CGS-EMU system, usesCoherentUnit, abampere]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesCoherentUnit
Context triple: [CGS-EMU system, usesCoherentUnit, abampere]
  • A. isCoherentSIUnit
    Indicates that a unit is a valid, internally consistent unit within the International System of Units (SI), derived strictly from SI base units without additional numerical factors.
  • B. isCoherentWithSI
    Indicates that something is consistent and compatible with the International System of Units (SI), adhering to its definitions, conventions, and relationships among units.
  • C. isNonCoherentWithSI
    Indicates that something does not conform to, or is inconsistent with, the specified standard or specification interface (SI).
  • D. isCoherent
    Indicates that the elements of something are logically consistent, well-organized, and fit together in a unified, intelligible way.
  • E. isCoherentInCGS
    Indicates that something maintains internal consistency or logical coherence within the CGS (centimeter–gram–second) unit system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabfd4648190bd0e5c7f4dbb6cab completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f48b9b687881908fd87a2f5fa0b1e7 completed May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f48060597c8190a4414e4e4fcb1fec completed May 1, 2026, 10:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f48b9058d081908ec9af261ee092e2 completed May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:04 a.m.