Triple

T24814350
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miguel García E620872 entity
Predicate hasGivenNameEquivalence P157373 FINISHED
Object Miguel corresponds to Michael in English NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miguel corresponds to Michael in English | Statement: [Miguel García, hasGivenNameEquivalence, Miguel corresponds to Michael in English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGivenNameEquivalence
Context triple: [Miguel García, hasGivenNameEquivalence, Miguel corresponds to Michael in English]
  • A. hasGivenNameTo
    Indicates that one entity has assigned or provided a given (first) name to another entity.
  • B. hasEquivalent
    Indicates that two entities are considered equal in value, meaning, or function within a given context.
  • C. hasGivenNameUsage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular way or context in which its given name is used.
  • D. hasNameGivenTo
    Indicates that one entity is the name that has been assigned or given to another entity.
  • E. hasGivenNameBasis
    Indicates that one entity’s given name is derived from, based on, or formed using another entity (such as a name, word, or person) as its basis.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabfd4648190bd0e5c7f4dbb6cab completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f42d9000b8819081ea2605f3c193d6 completed May 1, 2026, 4:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f420f471a0819095a6cd24ed8f7476 completed May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f42b11251881908070b93355de64ad completed May 1, 2026, 4:24 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5 a.m.