Triple

T24805866
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Newton interpolation polynomial E620656 entity
Predicate usesSequence P161421 FINISHED
Object nodes x_0, x_1, ..., x_n LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nodes x_0, x_1, ..., x_n | Statement: [Newton interpolation polynomial, usesSequence, nodes x_0, x_1, ..., x_n]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSequence
Context triple: [Newton interpolation polynomial, usesSequence, nodes x_0, x_1, ..., x_n]
  • A. isSequence
    Indicates that one entity is an ordered list or succession of elements arranged in a specific, meaningful order.
  • B. isSequenceOf
    Indicates that one entity occurs in a specific order directly following or as part of an ordered list relative to another entity.
  • C. usesSequentialPassages
    Indicates that one entity employs or organizes content in a series of passages that follow a specific sequential order.
  • D. sequenceWith
    Indicates that one entity occurs in a specific order directly before or after another entity as part of a defined sequence.
  • E. sequenceInWork
    Indicates that one work appears as a sequential part or installment within a larger overarching work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabf26bc8190b191faac8f67065b completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f613bc641c819084343cc78d080640 completed May 2, 2026, 3:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611a72780819082f44e66ca2c6ac9 completed May 2, 2026, 3 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f613502d808190b89927e5e734b43a completed May 2, 2026, 3:08 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:50 a.m.