Triple
T2477956
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Frohwerk v. United States |
E55132
|
entity |
| Predicate | governmentActionChallenged |
P12442
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal criminal prosecution for antiwar publications |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal criminal prosecution for antiwar publications | Statement: [Frohwerk v. United States, governmentActionChallenged, federal criminal prosecution for antiwar publications]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governmentActionChallenged Context triple: [Frohwerk v. United States, governmentActionChallenged, federal criminal prosecution for antiwar publications]
-
A.
governmentAction
chosen
Indicates actions, decisions, or interventions carried out by a government or its agencies in relation to other entities.
-
B.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
C.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
D.
stateActionChallenged
Indicates that an action taken by a state (or state authority) has been formally disputed, questioned, or contested by another party.
-
E.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e279e88190ab10d7248aea9d11 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd1eb3be481908fa7c6b8f1c78209 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0b5e3d481909a5cbc4a96edd24f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:45 p.m.