Triple

T24777433
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Water Genie E619899 entity
Predicate mayBeBoundTo P37017 FINISHED
Object enchanted ring LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enchanted ring | Statement: [Water Genie, mayBeBoundTo, enchanted ring]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeBoundTo
Context triple: [Water Genie, mayBeBoundTo, enchanted ring]
  • A. mayBeBoundBy
    Indicates that one entity is potentially subject to being constrained, restricted, or obligated by another entity (such as a rule, agreement, or condition), without asserting that this binding actually occurs.
  • B. areBoundFrom
    Indicates that one entity is constrained, limited, or restricted starting from a specified point, source, or condition.
  • C. isInitiallyBoundWith
    Indicates that two or more entities are connected, associated, or constrained together at the starting point of a process, state, or interaction.
  • D. bindsTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity physically or functionally attaches or connects to another, often with some specificity or selectivity in the interaction.
  • E. isBindingIn
    Indicates that one entity functions as a binding site or context in which another entity is bound or attached.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabd04488190a2d13c97be745a2d completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442a977b08190b44eac040cb90211 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:38 a.m.