Triple
T24773357
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Sanquhar |
E619789
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLastTitleHolder |
P158725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Robert Crichton, 8th Lord Sanquhar |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Robert Crichton, 8th Lord Sanquhar | Statement: [Lord Sanquhar, hasLastTitleHolder, Robert Crichton, 8th Lord Sanquhar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLastTitleHolder Context triple: [Lord Sanquhar, hasLastTitleHolder, Robert Crichton, 8th Lord Sanquhar]
-
A.
hasTitleHolder
Indicates that one entity is the current or designated holder of a specific title, position, or honor associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasTitleHolderTrait
Indicates that an entity possesses a characteristic or status specifically associated with holding a particular title.
-
C.
hasTitleHolderOrigin
Indicates that the origin or source location of a title holder is specified in relation to that title.
-
D.
hasSuccessorTitleHolder
Indicates that one entity is the next title holder or office bearer succeeding another entity in a given position or title.
-
E.
lastHolderTitle
Indicates the official title or position held by the most recent holder of a given role, asset, or entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fabd04488190a2d13c97be745a2d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f48b9b687881908fd87a2f5fa0b1e7 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f48060597c8190a4414e4e4fcb1fec |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f48b9058d081908ec9af261ee092e2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:32 a.m.