Triple

T24757479
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yabem–Takia language continuum E619330 entity
Predicate hasCoreLanguages P161420 FINISHED
Object Yabem NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yabem | Statement: [Yabem–Takia language continuum, hasCoreLanguages, Yabem]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoreLanguages
Context triple: [Yabem–Takia language continuum, hasCoreLanguages, Yabem]
  • A. hasLanguages
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
  • B. hasLanguageResources
    Indicates that an entity possesses or provides resources related to a particular language, such as tools, materials, or services supporting its use or study.
  • C. hasApproximateNumberOfLanguages
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a quantity representing an estimated or non-exact count of languages.
  • D. hasLanguageOn
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
  • E. hasMajorityLanguageServices
    Indicates that one language is used for the majority of services or service interactions within a given context or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabbea94819092ed41348909622f completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f613bc641c819084343cc78d080640 completed May 2, 2026, 3:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611a72780819082f44e66ca2c6ac9 completed May 2, 2026, 3 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f613502d808190b89927e5e734b43a completed May 2, 2026, 3:08 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:26 a.m.