Triple

T24748265
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trond Vernegg E619064 entity
Predicate languageAdvocacyFor P75229 FINISHED
Object Riksmål LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Riksmål | Statement: [Trond Vernegg, languageAdvocacyFor, Riksmål]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageAdvocacyFor
Context triple: [Trond Vernegg, languageAdvocacyFor, Riksmål]
  • A. languageAdvocated chosen
    Indicates that an entity actively supports, promotes, or argues in favor of the use or adoption of a particular language.
  • B. languageRights
    Indicates that certain individuals or groups are entitled to use, maintain, or receive services in a particular language under recognized rights or protections.
  • C. languageSubject
    Indicates that a particular language is the subject or topic being studied, discussed, or otherwise focused on in relation to another entity.
  • D. languageConsultant
    Indicates that one entity serves as a language consultant, providing expert advice or guidance on language-related matters to another entity.
  • E. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabb349881908a13a212a0221a63 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62d89b89c8190afb372a8172111e7 completed May 2, 2026, 4:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f62c1379f08190836c3e02b0c892df completed May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:23 a.m.