Triple
T24746878
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prince Oscar, Duke of Gotland |
E619022
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForLossOfDynasticRights |
P41735
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unequal marriage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unequal marriage | Statement: [Prince Oscar, Duke of Gotland, reasonForLossOfDynasticRights, unequal marriage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForLossOfDynasticRights Context triple: [Prince Oscar, Duke of Gotland, reasonForLossOfDynasticRights, unequal marriage]
-
A.
reasonForLossOfSuccessionRights
chosen
Indicates the specific cause or circumstance that led to an individual losing their rights of succession.
-
B.
endOfReignReason
Indicates the cause or circumstance that led to the termination of a ruler’s reign.
-
C.
lostFeudalRightsBy
Indicates that one party ceased to hold feudal rights or privileges as a result of actions or circumstances attributable to another party.
-
D.
dynastyDissolutionCause
Indicates the reason or factor that led to the dissolution or end of a dynasty.
-
E.
reasonForAbdication
Indicates the specific cause, motive, or circumstances that led an individual to formally abdicate a position of authority or power.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fabb349881908a13a212a0221a63 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f42d9000b8819081ea2605f3c193d6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 4:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f420f471a0819095a6cd24ed8f7476 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:22 a.m.