Triple

T24739379
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1946 Georgia gubernatorial election E618508 entity
Predicate wasDisputed P50823 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [1946 Georgia gubernatorial election, wasDisputed, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasDisputed
Context triple: [1946 Georgia gubernatorial election, wasDisputed, true]
  • A. laterDisputedBy
    Indicates that a previously made claim, statement, or assertion is subsequently challenged, questioned, or contradicted by another party.
  • B. disputed chosen
    Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
  • C. hasDisputedLegitimacy
    Indicates that the legitimacy or rightful status of an entity is contested or not universally recognized by relevant parties.
  • D. hasDisputedStatus
    Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
  • E. statusDisputedBy
    Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fab8f95c81908bb9e552cf3280c2 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f410a25ab88190a72db43043c1f6ff completed May 1, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f40ef612c88190ab2f3f08d4a92018 completed May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:04 a.m.