Triple

T2473912
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cool URIs for the Semantic Web E55041 entity
Predicate providesGuidelinesFor P18444 FINISHED
Object designing URI namespaces LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: designing URI namespaces | Statement: [Cool URIs for the Semantic Web, providesGuidelinesFor, designing URI namespaces]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesGuidelinesFor
Context triple: [Cool URIs for the Semantic Web, providesGuidelinesFor, designing URI namespaces]
  • A. providesGuidanceTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity offers direction, advice, or instruction to another entity.
  • B. guidanceType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of guidance being provided or referenced in the relationship between entities.
  • C. hasGuidelineCount
    Indicates the number of guidelines associated with or applicable to a given entity.
  • D. providesSupportTo
    Indicates that one entity offers help, resources, or reinforcement to another entity to aid its function, stability, or success.
  • E. recommendedPracticeDefinition
    Indicates that one entity defines or specifies the content or meaning of a recommended practice associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab49e279e88190ab10d7248aea9d11 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd1eb3be481908fa7c6b8f1c78209 completed March 7, 2026, 7:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0b5e3d481909a5cbc4a96edd24f completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:45 p.m.