Triple

T24738915
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Akurio E618493 entity
Predicate traditionalHuntingTools P87170 FINISHED
Object bows and arrows LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bows and arrows | Statement: [Akurio, traditionalHuntingTools, bows and arrows]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalHuntingTools
Context triple: [Akurio, traditionalHuntingTools, bows and arrows]
  • A. huntingStyle
    Indicates the characteristic manner or method an entity typically uses when hunting.
  • B. hunting
    Indicates one entity actively pursuing and attempting to capture or kill another entity, typically as prey.
  • C. associatedWithHunting chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved in, or commonly linked with the activity or practice of hunting.
  • D. huntingTime
    Indicates the time period during which a hunting activity takes place or is scheduled.
  • E. traditionalSubsistence
    Indicates that an entity relies on customary, small-scale methods of obtaining food and resources (such as hunting, gathering, fishing, or small-scale farming) primarily for direct consumption rather than for market sale.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fab8f95c81908bb9e552cf3280c2 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f464b4c9b0819085daa00c7c3b8b76 completed May 1, 2026, 8:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f45cf017a88190b4985b11159c907d completed May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:04 a.m.