Triple

T24730314
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2007 French presidential election E618264 entity
Predicate resultSecondRoundVoteShareWinner P101482 FINISHED
Object about 53.1% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: about 53.1% | Statement: [2007 French presidential election, resultSecondRoundVoteShareWinner, about 53.1%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultSecondRoundVoteShareWinner
Context triple: [2007 French presidential election, resultSecondRoundVoteShareWinner, about 53.1%]
  • A. secondRoundVoteShareOf chosen
    Indicates the proportion of total votes an entity receives in the second round of a multi-round voting or election process.
  • B. secondRoundRunnerUpVoteSharePercentage
    Indicates the percentage of total votes received by the candidate who finished as runner-up in the second round of a contest or election.
  • C. secondPartyPopularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of total popular votes received by the second party in an election.
  • D. firstRoundVoteShareWinnerPercentage
    Indicates the percentage of total votes received by the winning candidate or option in the first round of voting.
  • E. secondRoundCandidate
    Indicates that an entity has advanced past an initial selection stage and is being considered as a candidate in a second round of evaluation or decision-making.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fab772608190b74163751047ff50 completed April 18, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f422aee0408190899efe7e24ef2b40 completed May 1, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f420e92cc88190a803aecdae78a051 completed May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:02 a.m.