Triple
T2472607
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canon 28 |
E55011
|
entity |
| Predicate | affectedJurisdictionOver |
P39684
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pontic dioceses |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pontic dioceses | Statement: [Canon 28, affectedJurisdictionOver, Pontic dioceses]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affectedJurisdictionOver Context triple: [Canon 28, affectedJurisdictionOver, Pontic dioceses]
-
A.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
B.
hasJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
C.
affectedCourt
Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
-
D.
expandedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that an entity’s authority, control, or legal power has been extended to cover a broader scope, area, or set of subjects than it previously did.
-
E.
awardingJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or legal power granted to an entity to make decisions, judgments, or awards in a particular domain or case.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e279e88190ab10d7248aea9d11 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd1eb3be481908fa7c6b8f1c78209 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0b5e3d481909a5cbc4a96edd24f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd1e45380819094b3f32a278bd457 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:45 p.m.