Triple

T24722022
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Love All Over Me E612328 entity
Predicate hasOfficialRemix P75509 FINISHED
Object Love All Over Me (remix featuring Gucci Mane) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Love All Over Me (remix featuring Gucci Mane) | Statement: [Love All Over Me, hasOfficialRemix, Love All Over Me (remix featuring Gucci Mane)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOfficialRemix
Context triple: [Love All Over Me, hasOfficialRemix, Love All Over Me (remix featuring Gucci Mane)]
  • A. hasRemix
    Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
  • B. hasRemixed
    Indicates that one entity has created a new version or adaptation of another entity by remixing it.
  • C. hasRemixVariant
    Indicates that one entity is a remix version or reworked variant of another entity.
  • D. hasRemixProducer
    Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
  • E. hasRemixFeaturing chosen
    Indicates that an original work has a remix version that features an additional artist or artists not present in the original.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7d6e7a48190bb43b0d8bb1137a0 completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f453035f508190be83a3d521723acf completed May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f44d6ef33081908f5d36ba1ae5f473 completed May 1, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:41 a.m.