Triple

T24719649
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ophir (biblical region) E612260 entity
Predicate possibleLocationHypothesis P28981 FINISHED
Object India NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: India | Statement: [Ophir (biblical region), possibleLocationHypothesis, India]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleLocationHypothesis
Context triple: [Ophir (biblical region), possibleLocationHypothesis, India]
  • A. possibleLocation chosen
    Indicates that an entity may be located at, or could plausibly occur in, a specified place or spatial context.
  • B. possiblePosition
    Indicates that a given location or arrangement is a valid or allowable position for the entity within the specified context or constraints.
  • C. likelyLocatedIn
    Indicates that an entity is probably situated within or associated with a particular location, though not with absolute certainty.
  • D. hasAlternativeHypothesisLocation
    Indicates that there is another possible location proposed as an alternative to the primary hypothesized location.
  • E. plannedLocation
    Indicates the intended or scheduled location where an entity is expected to be or an event is planned to occur.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7d6e7a48190bb43b0d8bb1137a0 completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442a977b08190b44eac040cb90211 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:40 a.m.