Triple
T24694431
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grammy Award for blues music |
E611542
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableStyleCovered |
P135227
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contemporary blues |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contemporary blues | Statement: [Grammy Award for blues music, notableStyleCovered, contemporary blues]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableStyleCovered Context triple: [Grammy Award for blues music, notableStyleCovered, contemporary blues]
-
A.
notableStyleFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a distinctive stylistic characteristic or design element that is especially noteworthy or defining.
-
B.
notableCover
Indicates that one entity is a particularly well-known or significant cover version or adaptation of another entity.
-
C.
notableSubstyle
Indicates that one style is a notable or distinct subcategory within another broader style.
-
D.
notableCoverGenre
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a genre in which another entity is notably covered, adapted, or reinterpreted.
-
E.
notableHolderFullStyle
Indicates that a person is a notable holder of a title, position, or honor, expressed using their full formal style.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d76d148190b58ad612467149a5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62d89b89c8190afb372a8172111e7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1379f08190836c3e02b0c892df |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:21 a.m.