Triple
T24685288
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chopi people |
E611266
|
entity |
| Predicate | poetryFunction |
P156976
|
FINISHED |
| Object | social commentary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: social commentary | Statement: [Chopi people, poetryFunction, social commentary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: poetryFunction Context triple: [Chopi people, poetryFunction, social commentary]
-
A.
poem
Indicates that one entity is a poem created, authored, or associated with another entity.
-
B.
usesPoeticProgram
Indicates that one entity employs or applies a poetic program—such as a structured, rule-based, or stylistically poetic system—in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
poeticStyle
Indicates the stylistic or formal manner in which something is expressed in poetry, such as its structure, tone, and linguistic features.
-
D.
wrotePoemAbout
Indicates that one entity is the author of a poem whose subject or theme is another entity.
-
E.
poeticCategory
Indicates that one entity is classified as belonging to a particular poetic category or type of poetry in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d678b081908910f4271627a31a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f410fe3b848190ae296a29f742ee30 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f40ee8ada8819089a7016b50308ff0 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f410fc18808190b4e47d5a71d3a126 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:17 a.m.