Triple

T24682300
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jonathan Livingston Seagull (orchestration) E611171 entity
Predicate hasArrangerCredit P105966 FINISHED
Object Lee Holdridge NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lee Holdridge | Statement: [Jonathan Livingston Seagull (orchestration), hasArrangerCredit, Lee Holdridge]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArrangerCredit
Context triple: [Jonathan Livingston Seagull (orchestration), hasArrangerCredit, Lee Holdridge]
  • A. hasArranger
    Indicates that one entity serves as the arranger (e.g., musically or structurally) for another entity, such as a work, performance, or composition.
  • B. hasArrangerBackground
    Indicates that an entity has a background or experience in musical arranging.
  • C. artistNameCredit
    Indicates that a specific artist is credited by name for their contribution to a work or production.
  • D. notableArrangementOf
    Indicates that one entity is a significant or noteworthy configuration, ordering, or spatial organization of the other entity.
  • E. musicOrchestratedBy chosen
    Indicates that a piece of music or musical work is arranged or orchestrated by a specific person or entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4d5c2dc8190ac857dea25ec6ce9 completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f410fe3b848190ae296a29f742ee30 completed May 1, 2026, 2:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f40ee8ada8819089a7016b50308ff0 completed May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:15 a.m.