Triple
T24677942
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barak |
E611041
|
entity |
| Predicate | requestedPresenceOf |
P156964
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Deborah in battle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Deborah in battle | Statement: [Barak, requestedPresenceOf, Deborah in battle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requestedPresenceOf Context triple: [Barak, requestedPresenceOf, Deborah in battle]
-
A.
possiblePresenceIn
Indicates that an entity may be located in, occur in, or exist within a specified place, context, or container, without asserting that it is definitively present there.
-
B.
requiresPresence
Indicates that one entity’s existence, operation, or validity depends on another entity being present or available.
-
C.
confirmedPresenceOf
Indicates that the presence or existence of an entity has been verified as true or established with certainty.
-
D.
statePresence
Indicates that an entity exists, operates, or is present within a particular state or governmental jurisdiction.
-
E.
traditionalPresenceIn
Indicates that an entity has a customary or historically established presence within a particular place, context, or setting.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d5c2dc8190ac857dea25ec6ce9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f41011d8048190be70329ba0bfb7c7 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f40ed9d47881909fcfc0d04e8d074a |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f41010f06c81908ee7f773220df14f |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:07 a.m.