Triple
T24677540
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bill Clinton–Paula Jones scandal |
E611029
|
entity |
| Predicate | SupremeCourtDecisionVote |
P81203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 9–0 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 9–0 | Statement: [Bill Clinton–Paula Jones scandal, SupremeCourtDecisionVote, 9–0]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SupremeCourtDecisionVote Context triple: [Bill Clinton–Paula Jones scandal, SupremeCourtDecisionVote, 9–0]
-
A.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
-
B.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
C.
majorityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices constitute more than half of the members of the relevant court or judicial panel in a given decision or context.
-
D.
majorityJusticesCount
chosen
Indicates the number of justices whose votes form the majority in a judicial decision.
-
E.
dissentingJusticesCount
Indicates the number of justices who formally disagreed with the majority opinion in a judicial decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d5c2dc8190ac857dea25ec6ce9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f41011d8048190be70329ba0bfb7c7 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f40ed9d47881909fcfc0d04e8d074a |
completed | May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:06 a.m.