Triple
T24674893
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ô Môn District |
E610954
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasServiceDevelopment |
P157673
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Ô Môn District, hasServiceDevelopment, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasServiceDevelopment Context triple: [Ô Môn District, hasServiceDevelopment, true]
-
A.
hasComponentDevelopment
Indicates that an entity is involved in or responsible for the development of one or more of its components.
-
B.
hasDevelopmentFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a role or purpose in the growth, progression, or improvement of another entity or process.
-
C.
hasDevelopmentType
Indicates the type or category of development associated with an entity, such as the nature, form, or stage of its development.
-
D.
hasDevelopmentSystem
Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a particular system, platform, or environment used for development activities.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentOrganization
Indicates that an entity is associated with, managed by, or supported by a specific organization responsible for its development.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d5c2dc8190ac857dea25ec6ce9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442a977b08190b44eac040cb90211 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f44a3adb7c8190941572f718b3b93c |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:02 a.m.