Triple
T24652361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | U2 |
E610285
|
entity |
| Predicate | visualIdentityRecognizedAs |
P157160
|
FINISHED |
| Object | iconic in popular culture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: iconic in popular culture | Statement: [U2, visualIdentityRecognizedAs, iconic in popular culture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: visualIdentityRecognizedAs Context triple: [U2, visualIdentityRecognizedAs, iconic in popular culture]
-
A.
visualIdentity
Indicates the relationship in which one entity defines, shapes, or represents the visual appearance and branding style of another entity.
-
B.
areRecognizedBy
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity as valid, known, or legitimate.
-
C.
recognizedAs
Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted as having the identity, role, status, or classification of another entity.
-
D.
canRecognize
Indicates that one entity has the ability to identify or distinguish another entity based on its features or characteristics.
-
E.
hasBrandRecognitionFor
Indicates that one entity is aware of, recognizes, or can identify the brand of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d350a481909170482bc2ce6af9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f422aee0408190899efe7e24ef2b40 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f420e92cc88190a803aecdae78a051 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f422add8508190a76e56cfa756eeb8 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:34 a.m.