Triple
T2465126
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saginaw County, Michigan |
E55228
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAgriculturalProducts |
P25683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | corn |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: corn | Statement: [Saginaw County, Michigan, hasAgriculturalProducts, corn]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgriculturalProducts Context triple: [Saginaw County, Michigan, hasAgriculturalProducts, corn]
-
A.
hasAgriculturalProduction
chosen
Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
-
B.
traditionalAgriculturalProduct
Indicates that something is recognized as an agricultural product produced using long-established, customary methods and practices.
-
C.
typeOfFarmProductInDispute
Indicates that a specific kind of farm product is the subject of a disagreement, conflict, or legal dispute between parties.
-
D.
isCultivatedAs
Indicates that one entity is intentionally grown, tended, or produced by another as a crop, resource, or cultivated organism.
-
E.
cultivatedFor
Indicates that one entity is intentionally grown, raised, or developed for the benefit, use, or purpose of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e3622c8190ad22afa2c4fbb807 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd2bc7b5481908b3664495e99f1a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0b3ea308190a6d8499c2a542c50 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.