Triple

T24630979
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Association football E609672 entity
Predicate disciplinarySanction P136225 FINISHED
Object yellow card LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yellow card | Statement: [Association football, disciplinarySanction, yellow card]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disciplinarySanction
Context triple: [Association football, disciplinarySanction, yellow card]
  • A. employerSanctionsDescription
    Indicates a description of penalties or disciplinary actions imposed by an employer in response to certain behaviors, violations, or conditions.
  • B. coSanctionedBy
    Indicates that an action, decision, or measure is jointly authorized, approved, or endorsed by multiple entities.
  • C. sanction
    Indicates the imposition of an official penalty or restrictive measure by an authority in response to certain actions or behaviors.
  • D. disciplinaryActionBy chosen
    Indicates that a disciplinary measure or sanction is imposed on an entity by a specified authority or agent.
  • E. introducedEmployerSanctions
    Indicates that an entity initiated or established penalties or restrictive measures to be applied to employers.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4d1d3708190a0f2dc6a3a8523bb completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2be064ff88190b5d9e5ec75a41242 completed April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6d0ab708190b2e3b94dd20ca76b completed April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:32 a.m.