Triple
T24630681
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 掛布くん |
E609662
|
entity |
| Predicate | refersToReputation |
P87909
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 日本プロ野球を代表する強打者 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 日本プロ野球を代表する強打者 | Statement: [掛布くん, refersToReputation, 日本プロ野球を代表する強打者]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: refersToReputation Context triple: [掛布くん, refersToReputation, 日本プロ野球を代表する強打者]
-
A.
refersToPersonReputation
chosen
Indicates that something is about, concerns, or makes reference to a particular person's reputation.
-
B.
denotesReputationOf
Indicates that one entity represents, expresses, or serves as an indicator of the reputation or perceived standing of another entity.
-
C.
associatedWithReputation
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
-
D.
hasReputationAmong
Indicates that an entity is regarded or perceived in a particular way by a specified group or audience.
-
E.
haveReputation
Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded in a certain way by others, reflecting its perceived character, quality, or status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d1d3708190a0f2dc6a3a8523bb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6d0ab708190b2e3b94dd20ca76b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:32 a.m.