Triple
T24628355
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chile–Argentina relations |
E609602
|
entity |
| Predicate | includeCooperationIn |
P105166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Antarctic affairs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Antarctic affairs | Statement: [Chile–Argentina relations, includeCooperationIn, Antarctic affairs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includeCooperationIn Context triple: [Chile–Argentina relations, includeCooperationIn, Antarctic affairs]
-
A.
involvesCooperation
Indicates that the related entities participate together in a shared activity or goal that requires mutual assistance or coordinated effort.
-
B.
implementedInCooperationWith
Indicates that an action, project, or initiative was carried out jointly or collaboratively together with another party.
-
C.
cooperationAmong
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which multiple entities work together collaboratively toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
-
D.
definesCooperationWith
Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
-
E.
usesCollaboration
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on collaborative methods, tools, or partnerships with another entity to achieve a shared goal or perform an activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d1d3708190a0f2dc6a3a8523bb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6d0ab708190b2e3b94dd20ca76b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:32 a.m.