Triple
T24596622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rastrick |
E608689
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLocalWard |
P14475
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rastrick ward |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rastrick ward | Statement: [Rastrick, hasLocalWard, Rastrick ward]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalWard Context triple: [Rastrick, hasLocalWard, Rastrick ward]
-
A.
hasLocalDistrict
Indicates that an entity is associated with or falls under the jurisdiction of a specific local administrative district.
-
B.
hasNeighbouringWard
Indicates that one ward is directly adjacent to or borders another ward geographically.
-
C.
containsWard
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, encompasses, or has within it a ward (such as a district, division, or dependent person) as part of its scope or responsibility.
-
D.
isWardOf
Indicates that one entity is under the guardianship, protection, or legal care of another entity as their ward.
-
E.
electoralWardFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the electoral ward or voting district in which another entity (such as a place or address) is located or represented.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4cf54248190af7b0c2d9ade9830 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6ca751c8190a040c10d701ecf3a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:30 a.m.