Triple

T24595582
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Randy Badazz Alpert E608658 entity
Predicate instrumentalWork P89775 FINISHED
Object Rise NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rise | Statement: [Randy Badazz Alpert, instrumentalWork, Rise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: instrumentalWork
Context triple: [Randy Badazz Alpert, instrumentalWork, Rise]
  • A. instrumentalIn
    Indicates that one entity serves as a crucial means, tool, or contributing factor in bringing about an outcome or enabling another entity’s action or effect.
  • B. musicalWork chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is identified as a musical composition or piece associated with another entity (such as a creator, performance, or recording).
  • C. collaboratesWithInstrument
    Indicates that an entity works together or performs an activity in conjunction with a specified instrument.
  • D. notableInstrumentalContribution
    Indicates that an entity has made a significant and influential instrumental contribution to another entity, work, or outcome.
  • E. instrument
    Indicates that an action is carried out using a particular tool, means, or implement as its instrument.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4cf54248190af7b0c2d9ade9830 completed April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 completed April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6ca751c8190a040c10d701ecf3a completed April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:30 a.m.