Triple

T24595502
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Privilegium Maius E608656 entity
Predicate recognizedAsForgeryBy P63298 FINISHED
Object Emperor Charles IV NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Emperor Charles IV | Statement: [Privilegium Maius, recognizedAsForgeryBy, Emperor Charles IV]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizedAsForgeryBy
Context triple: [Privilegium Maius, recognizedAsForgeryBy, Emperor Charles IV]
  • A. forgeryProbability
    Indicates the likelihood that an item, document, or representation is forged or not authentic.
  • B. exposedAsForgeryWork chosen
    Indicates that a work has been revealed or officially determined to be a forgery rather than an authentic piece.
  • C. recognizedThrough
    Indicates that something becomes known, identified, or acknowledged by means of a particular method, medium, or process.
  • D. recognizedFor
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged, credited, or honored for a particular achievement, quality, contribution, or work associated with another entity.
  • E. isSubjectToCounterfeiting
    Indicates that something is vulnerable to being illegally imitated, forged, or reproduced in order to deceive.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4cf54248190af7b0c2d9ade9830 completed April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 completed April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6ca751c8190a040c10d701ecf3a completed April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:30 a.m.