Triple
T24584932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rainbow |
E608358
|
entity |
| Predicate | furtherExplainedBy |
P59295
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Isaac Newton |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Isaac Newton | Statement: [Rainbow, furtherExplainedBy, Isaac Newton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: furtherExplainedBy Context triple: [Rainbow, furtherExplainedBy, Isaac Newton]
-
A.
laterExplained
chosen
Indicates that an earlier event, statement, or situation is clarified or made understandable by information provided at a subsequent time.
-
B.
enhancedBy
Indicates that one entity’s value, effectiveness, or impact is increased or improved as a result of another entity.
-
C.
expandedBy
Indicates that one entity increases, elaborates, or builds upon the scope, detail, or extent of another entity.
-
D.
usedToExplain
Indicates that one entity serves as an explanation or clarification for another entity.
-
E.
requiresFurtherDefinitionFor
Indicates that one entity is not sufficiently specified or clear on its own and therefore needs additional definition, clarification, or refinement provided by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4ce89248190ad99e18f0638dfbb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a98600888190aa631d2c237af60a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6c1f07081908edf0b521767e79b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:29 a.m.