Triple
T24580248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Women's Rugby League World Cup |
E608226
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasQualificationProcess |
P27572
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Women's Rugby League World Cup, hasQualificationProcess, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasQualificationProcess Context triple: [Women's Rugby League World Cup, hasQualificationProcess, yes]
-
A.
hasQualification
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific qualification, credential, or competency.
-
B.
qualificationProcess
chosen
Indicates the process or set of steps through which an entity is evaluated and approved as meeting required qualifications or standards.
-
C.
eligibilityProcess
Indicates the procedure or set of criteria used to determine whether an entity qualifies for a particular status, benefit, or participation.
-
D.
hasQualificationCriteria
Indicates that there are specific conditions or standards that must be met for something to be considered eligible or acceptable.
-
E.
hasQualifying
Indicates that one entity possesses or meets a specific condition, attribute, or criterion that qualifies it in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4ce89248190ad99e18f0638dfbb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a97fde9c81909d8de91b6358a015 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6c1f07081908edf0b521767e79b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:29 a.m.