Triple
T24566392
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sercial |
E607800
|
entity |
| Predicate | oxidativeAgingSuitability |
P156370
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Sercial, oxidativeAgingSuitability, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oxidativeAgingSuitability Context triple: [Sercial, oxidativeAgingSuitability, high]
-
A.
oxidativeAging
Indicates a process where a substance or material undergoes deterioration or change over time due to reactions with oxygen or oxidative agents.
-
B.
typicalAgingTime
Indicates the usual duration required for something to age or mature under normal conditions.
-
C.
mayBeAgedIn
Indicates that an entity has the potential or option to undergo an aging or maturation process in a specified medium, container, or environment.
-
D.
isSuitableFor
Indicates that one entity is appropriate, fitting, or well-matched for use, application, or association with another entity.
-
E.
typicalAgingIndication
Indicates that something serves as a sign or marker commonly associated with the normal process of aging.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4cc35a48190990b7571bc086df8 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a92082a881908896dcdda85559b9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b99e7c8190ba7e2dc8729a314a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f2a846c5bc81909ba50cee483bea91 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:28 a.m.