Triple
T24566344
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | English Football League managers |
E607799
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayHoldQualification |
P156368
|
FINISHED |
| Object | UEFA Pro Licence |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UEFA Pro Licence | Statement: [English Football League managers, mayHoldQualification, UEFA Pro Licence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayHoldQualification Context triple: [English Football League managers, mayHoldQualification, UEFA Pro Licence]
-
A.
mayHold
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
-
B.
qualifyingFor
Indicates that one entity meets the necessary conditions or criteria to be eligible for another entity, status, or action.
-
C.
hasQualifying
Indicates that one entity possesses or meets a specific condition, attribute, or criterion that qualifies it in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
hasQualification
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific qualification, credential, or competency.
-
E.
mayPass
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to move through, cross, or gain access to another entity or location.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4cc35a48190990b7571bc086df8 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a92082a881908896dcdda85559b9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b99e7c8190ba7e2dc8729a314a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f2a846c5bc81909ba50cee483bea91 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:28 a.m.