Triple
T24547447
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bravonium |
E607263
|
entity |
| Predicate | RomanNameFor |
P6662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Leintwardine |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leintwardine | Statement: [Bravonium, RomanNameFor, Leintwardine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: RomanNameFor Context triple: [Bravonium, RomanNameFor, Leintwardine]
-
A.
romanNomen
Indicates that an entity has a specific Roman nomen, i.e., the clan or gens name within the traditional Roman naming system.
-
B.
preRomanName
Indicates the name by which an entity (such as a place or people) was known before the Roman period or prior to receiving a Roman-era name.
-
C.
romanCivitasName
Indicates that an entity bears the official Roman civitas (city or community) name associated with it.
-
D.
cognomenOf
Indicates that one entity is the cognomen (surname or family name) of another entity.
-
E.
hasRomanName
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or known by a name derived from or used in ancient Rome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4c9bf94819082d05da6f5c29907 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a8caba8c819082c3bf33b6ff9cd0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b99e7c8190ba7e2dc8729a314a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:27 a.m.