Triple
T24544243
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De Ecclesia |
E607176
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedAsEvidenceAgainst |
P119516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jan Hus at the Council of Constance |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jan Hus at the Council of Constance | Statement: [De Ecclesia, usedAsEvidenceAgainst, Jan Hus at the Council of Constance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsEvidenceAgainst Context triple: [De Ecclesia, usedAsEvidenceAgainst, Jan Hus at the Council of Constance]
-
A.
usedInArgumentAgainst
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as support within an argument opposing or criticizing a particular claim, position, or entity.
-
B.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
C.
worksToProveInnocenceOf
Indicates that one entity actively engages in efforts or actions aimed at demonstrating or establishing the innocence of another entity.
-
D.
usedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
-
E.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4c9bf94819082d05da6f5c29907 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b0ca8081908d931aec560eae56 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:26 a.m.