Triple
T24542808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garnata |
E607141
|
entity |
| Predicate | refersToModernCity |
P156663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Granada |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Granada | Statement: [Garnata, refersToModernCity, Granada]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: refersToModernCity Context triple: [Garnata, refersToModernCity, Granada]
-
A.
containsModernCity
Indicates that one geographic or administrative region includes within its boundaries a currently existing modern city.
-
B.
relatesToAncientCity
Indicates a relationship or connection between an entity and an ancient city, such as origin, location, influence, or relevance.
-
C.
modernLocationOfCity
Indicates that a historical or former city is located within the boundaries of a specified modern administrative or geographic entity.
-
D.
isHistoricalCity
Indicates that a city has historical significance, typically due to its age, past events, or preserved heritage.
-
E.
refersToFormerNameOfComparisonCity
Indicates that the subject entity refers to a previous or former name of the comparison city.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4c9bf94819082d05da6f5c29907 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b0ca8081908d931aec560eae56 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f2b8b8bc5881908df49c0b07110246 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:26 a.m.