Triple

T24542795
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Garnata E607141 entity
Predicate usedInHistoricalContextFor P16500 FINISHED
Object Granada NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Granada | Statement: [Garnata, usedInHistoricalContextFor, Granada]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInHistoricalContextFor
Context triple: [Garnata, usedInHistoricalContextFor, Granada]
  • A. hasHistoricalContext
    Indicates that something is related to, influenced by, or best understood in light of specific past events, conditions, or time periods.
  • B. historicallyUsedFor
    Indicates that something served a particular function or purpose at some point in the past, even if it may no longer be used that way now.
  • C. hasHistoriographicalUse chosen
    Indicates that something is used or cited within historical writing or analysis as part of constructing, interpreting, or debating historical narratives.
  • D. hasHistoricalContextDisplays
    Indicates that something presents or showcases information within a broader historical background or setting.
  • E. hasHistoricalMeaning
    Indicates that something carries significance, symbolism, or relevance derived from past events, contexts, or traditions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4c9bf94819082d05da6f5c29907 completed April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 completed April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6b0ca8081908d931aec560eae56 completed April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:26 a.m.